Patent research compares claims relevant to the proposed platform
A new research document compares twelve US patents and published applications relevant to proposed attribution, contributor payments, licensed generation and marketplaces.
Patent claim comparison
The report compares eight grants and four published applications against proposed platform features. It ranks review priorities by relevance, not infringement probability or patent strength.
Proposed pilot review
The report recommends permissioned retrieval, recorded source use and accepted contributor agreements for the proposed pilot. It warns that retrieval with rewards does not establish patent clearance and recommends claim-by-claim review before commercial deployment.
Research limits and documentation
The report describes its findings as a research screen, not a legal opinion. It notes that reported patent statuses lack official verification. The README adds the report to the documentation list.
Files in this change
| File | Change | Lines |
|---|---|---|
README.md | modified | +1 −0 |
docs/SOVEREIGN_SOURCE_PATENT_LANDSCAPE_RESEARCH.md | added | +137 −0 |